Trump lawyers seek dismissal of DC federal election subversion case, arguing presidential immunity
Headline from The Republic
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Donald Trump asked a judge Thursday to dismiss the Washington federal election subversion case against him, arguing the Republican is immune from prosecution for actions they say were taken in his official role as president.
The Republic's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Donald Trump asked a judge Thursday to dismiss the Washington federal election subversion case against him, arguing the Republican is immune from prosecution for actions they say were taken in his official role as president.
Donald Trump’s lawyers asked a judge to throw out charges that he conspired to overturn the 2020 election, arguing that a president could not be criminally prosecuted for official acts.
Former President Donald Trump denies charges from special counsel Jack Smith that he conspired to overturn his electoral loss to President Joe Biden in 2020.
The presidential immunity argument had been foreshadowed for weeks by defense lawyers as one of multiple challenges they intend to bring against the indictment.
Donald Trump has asked the federal judge overseeing special counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case to dismiss the criminal charges, arguing he has immunity because he was president at the time and also was acquitted by the US Senate after his impeachment.
Attorneys for former President Donald Trump are seeking to have his election conspiracy criminal indictment dismissed because of presidential immunity. In a filing on Thursday, Trump’s legal …
Former President Donald Trump's lawyers have asked a federal court to dismiss the 2020 election interference case against him, a move that could signal their intent for future Supreme Court review.
The motion itself highlights several areas on which Trump could lose the motion, but they are issues of law not fact. Which makes them ripe for an appeal if (and likely when) the District Court Judge denies the motion.
Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.
