Coverage dated November 5, 2023 to November 7, 2023
The Supreme Court seems likely to preserve a gun law that protects domestic violence victims
Headline from KVIA El Paso
By MARK SHERMAN Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court seemed likely Tuesday to preserve a federal law that prohibits people under domestic violence restraining orders from having guns. In their first guns case since last year’s expansion of gun rights, the justices suggested that they…
KVIA El Paso's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.
The case before the Supreme Court involves a gun law enacted by Congress nearly 30 years ago that prohibits people under domestic violence restraining orders from having firearms.
The justices on Tuesday are taking up a challenge to a federal law that prohibits people from having guns if they are under a court order to stay away from their spouse, partner or other family members.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is taking up a challenge to a federal law that prohibits people from having guns if they are under a court order to stay away from their spouse, partner or other family members. The justices are hearing arguments Tuesday in their first case about guns
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear arguments over a 30-year-old federal ban on firearms for people under domestic violence restraining orders.
The case before the Supreme Court involves a gun law enacted by Congress nearly 30 years ago that prohibits people under domestic violence restraining orders from having firearms.
The Supreme Court is taking up a challenge to a federal law that prohibits people from having guns if they are under a court order to stay away from their spouse, partner or other family members
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a challenge to a 1994 law prohibiting people facing domestic violence restraining orders from having guns. Tuesday’s case is the first involving guns
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is taking up a challenge to a federal law that prohibits people from having guns if they are under a court order to
Liberal and conservative justices sounded persuaded by arguments from the Biden administration's top Supreme Court lawyer that the prohibition is in line with the longstanding practice of disarming dangerous people.
The case will test how far the conservative majority is willing to go in interpreting the scope of the court's 2022 ruling that expanded gun rights outside the home.
By MARK SHERMAN Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court seemed likely Tuesday to preserve a federal law that prohibits people under domestic violence restraining orders from having guns. In their first guns case since last year’s expansion of gun rights, the justices suggested that they…
Should it be legal to take away the guns of people who are under a domestic violence protective order, which aims to shield victims from abusers? That's the question in one of the biggest cases before the Supreme Court.
SCOTUS considered Tuesday whether a law barring subjects of domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms violates the Second Amendment.
The court, whose gun rights decision last year set a new historical legal standard, will consider whether the government may disarm people subject to restraining orders for domestic abuse.
U.S. Supreme Court justices during Tuesday’s oral arguments seemed to lean toward upholding a federal law that prevents the possession of firearms by a person who is subject to a domestic violence protective order
The justices on Tuesday suggested they will reverse a ruling from an appeals court in New Orleans that struck down the 1994 ban on firearms for people under court order to stay away from their spouses or partners.
The Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday for United States vs. Rahimi, a case that will decide whether individuals placed under domestic violence protection orders have the right to possess firearms.
Showing the first 25 of 42 headlines. ·
Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.
The Supreme Court seems likely to preserve a gun law that protects domestic violence victims | Since Then
