Create account

Coverage dated December 11, 2022 to December 12, 2022

Supreme Court won’t block California flavored tobacco ban

Headline from WTOP Washington DC

The Supreme Court on Monday refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November.

WTOP Washington DC's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.

Read the reports

Reports & sources

22 articles, oldest first.

  1. NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth

    Supreme Court Upholds California Ban on Flavored Tobacco (opens NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth)

    Published

    NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth's feed description

    The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid from the tobacco industry to block a California ban on flavored tobacco products.

  2. WTOP Washington DC

    Supreme Court won’t block California flavored tobacco ban (opens WTOP Washington DC)

    Published

    WTOP Washington DC's feed description

    The Supreme Court on Monday refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November.

  3. Los Angeles Times

    Supreme Court upholds California ban on sale of flavored tobacco products (opens Los Angeles Times)

    Published

    Los Angeles Times's feed description

    The Supreme Court clears the way for California to enforce a ban on the sale of most flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes.

  4. New York Times

    Supreme Court Refuses to Block California’s Ban on Flavored Tobacco (opens New York Times)

    Published

    New York Times's feed description

    The state’s voters had overwhelmingly supported letting a two-year-old law take effect, and lower courts had refused to put it on hold.

  5. ABC 17 Mid-Missouri

    Supreme Court declines to block California's ban on flavored cigarettes (opens ABC 17 Mid-Missouri)

    Published

    ABC 17 Mid-Missouri's feed description

    By Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter The Supreme Court on Monday denied a request from tobacco company R.J. Reynolds to challenge a California law that bans the sale of flavored cigarettes. There were no noted dissents.

  6. Courthouse News Service

    Supreme Court clears the way for California ban on flavored tobacco (opens Courthouse News Service)

    Published

    Courthouse News Service's feed description

    Tobacco companies wanted emergency intervention, claiming the law's enactment later this month will cost them millions.

  7. St. Louis Post-Dispatch

    California's Flavored Tobacco Ban Won't Be Blocked by Supreme Court (opens St. Louis Post-Dispatch)

    Published

    St. Louis Post-Dispatch's feed description

    TUESDAY, Dec. 13, 2022 (HealthDay News) – An attempt to block California’s flavored tobacco ban was stopped Monday when the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.

  8. FOX Business

    Supreme Court will not block California flavored tobacco ban (opens FOX Business)

    Published

    FOX Business's feed description

    Tobacco companies took California's recently-approved by voters ban on flavored tobacco products to the U.S. Supreme Court and lost. The ban takes effect Dec. 21.

  9. The Guardian

    Supreme court upholds California’s ban on flavored tobacco despite industry pushback (opens The Guardian)

    Published

    The Guardian's feed description

    RJ Reynolds and other tobacco companies sought the high court’s intervention to keep the ban from taking effect by 21 December

  10. The Week

    Supreme Court upholds California's ban on flavored tobacco products (opens The Week)

    Published

  11. CBS 8 San Diego

    Supreme Court upholds California ban on flavored tobacco products (opens CBS 8 San Diego)

    Published

    CBS 8 San Diego's feed description

    63% of California voters approved this ban on flavored tobacco: a ban that will now move forward, after the nation's highest court weighed in.

Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.

Supreme Court won’t block California flavored tobacco ban | Since Then