Updated on June 25 at 5:10 p.m. The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the federal government’s policy of systematically turning back asylum seekers before they can reach the U.S.-Mexico border. By a vote of 6-3, the justices agreed with the Trump administration in Mullin v.
SCOTUSblog's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.
Developments in this update
2 dated developments, oldest first, newest marked. Each is named by one outlet's own headline; open its reports to see every outlet that covered it.
Names this update
Justices side with Trump administration in border dispute over asylum seekers
Headline from SCOTUSblog ·
Newest
Supreme Court Protects Policy of Turning Asylum Seekers Away at the Border
The Supreme Court ruled that migrants must physically enter the U.S. to be eligible for asylum. Critics argue the decision could create incentives for illegal border crossings.
On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to potentially revive a policy that limits how many migrants can apply for asylum each day at the U.S.-Mexico border, overturning a lower court ruling that had blocked the practice.
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court sided Thursday with the Trump administration’s request to turn away asylum seekers who present themselves at ports of entry at the U.S.-Mexico border. The question the justices considered was whether migrants have to fully cross into the United States in order to …
Updated on June 25 at 5:10 p.m. The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the federal government’s policy of systematically turning back asylum seekers before they can reach the U.S.-Mexico border. By a vote of 6-3, the justices agreed with the Trump administration in Mullin v.
The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the Trump administration to turn away asylum seekers at the southern border who haven't yet crossed into U.S. territory. Why it matters: The Court's decision resolves a years-long legal fight over a Border Patrol practice when there's limited bandwid…
The Supreme Court has sided with the Trump administration in a major blow to the rights of immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers. The court ruled 6 to 3 along partisan lines to sanction so-called metering at the southern border, which allows immigration officers at ports of entry to block asylum s…
The U.S. Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a pair of immigration victories Thursday, ruling along 6-3 lines that asylum seekers turned away at the southern border while still in Mexico have not legally "arrived" in the United States, and that federal courts lack authority to block the ad…
Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.
Justices side with Trump administration in border dispute over asylum seekers | Since Then
