Supreme Court doesn't see humor in poop-themed dog toy arguments, sides with Jack Daniel's
Headline from 12News Phoenix
“This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in an unanimous opinion for the court.
12News Phoenix's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.
“This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in an unanimous opinion for the court.
“This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in an unanimous opinion for the court.
The Supreme Court said the distiller of Jack Daniel’s whiskey could pursue a trademark claim against the maker of Bad Spaniels, a dog toy resembling a famous liquor bottle.
“This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in an unanimous opinion for the court.
The Supreme Court on Thursday gave whiskey maker Jack Daniel’s reason to raise a glass, handing the company a new chance to win a trademark dispute with the makers of the Bad Spaniels dog toy.
The Supreme Court unanimously sided with Jack Daniel's Thursday in its bid to hold a dog toy company accountable for a poop-themed parody of its product.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled narrowly in favor of Jack Daniel's Products Inc. in a trademark infringement case concerning a dog toy parody.
Jack Daniel's, the famous Tennessee whiskey company, tried to stop production and marketing of a dog toy shaped and decorated like a Jack Daniel's bottle but with the name "Bad Spaniels" on the label.
By Devan Cole, CNN Washington (CNN) — The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with Jack Daniel’s in a dispute over a poop-themed dog toy that parodies its iconic liquor bottle, ruling that a lower court erred when it said the toy was covered by the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that a dog toy mimicking the famous Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle might have infringed — and damaged — the beverage company’s trademark.
The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with Jack Daniel's in a dispute over a poop-themed dog toy that parodies its iconic liquor bottle, ruling that a lower court erred when
Washington (CNN) — The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with Jack Daniel’s in a dispute over a poop-themed dog toy that parodies its iconic liquor bottle, ruling that
The Supreme Court on Thursday handed a win to Jack Daniel's, siding with the company in a trademark dispute with a company that makes a dog toy shaped like the distiller's whiskey bottle.
WASHINGTON >> The Supreme Court today gave whiskey maker Jack Daniel’s reason to raise a glass, handing the company a new chance to win a trademark dispute with the makers of the Bad Spaniels dog toy.
Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.
Supreme Court doesn't see humor in poop-themed dog toy arguments, sides with Jack Daniel's | Since Then
