Coverage dated October 1, 2023

Supreme Court declines to hear case from Trump attorney involving election interference

Headline from Courthouse News Service

As the justices took the bench for the first time since June, they denied a petition from John Eastman over emails he was ordered to produce to the House Jan. 6 committee.

Courthouse News Service's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.

Reports & sources

11 articles, oldest first.

  1. The Daily Caller

    Supreme Court Won’t Hear John Eastman’s Bid To Vacate Rulings That Forced Him To Hand Over Emails To Jan. 6 Committee (opens The Daily Caller)

    Published

    The Daily Caller's feed description

    The Supreme Court declined to hear John Eastman's appeal of a lower court decision that required him to disclose emails to the Jan. 6 committee.

  2. New Hampshire Union Leader

    Supreme Court rejects former Trump lawyer Eastman's appeal over emails (opens New Hampshire Union Leader)

    Published

    New Hampshire Union Leader's feed description

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by John Eastman, a conservative lawyer indicted in August over his role in efforts to overturn Donald Trump’s 2020

  3. New Hampshire Union Leader

    Supreme Court denies Jan. 6 appeal from former Trump lawyer John Eastman (opens New Hampshire Union Leader)

    Published

    New Hampshire Union Leader's feed description

    The Supreme Court on Monday denied a request from conservative lawyer John Eastman to wipe out a lower court ruling that said he and former president Donald Trump "more likely

  4. Courthouse News Service

    Supreme Court declines to hear case from Trump attorney involving election interference (opens Courthouse News Service)

    Published

    Courthouse News Service's feed description

    As the justices took the bench for the first time since June, they denied a petition from John Eastman over emails he was ordered to produce to the House Jan. 6 committee.

  5. CBS News

    Supreme Court declines to take up appeal from John Eastman involving emails sought by House Jan. 6 select committee (opens CBS News)

    Published

    CBS News's feed description

    Justice Clarence Thomas "took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition."

  6. Politico

    Supreme Court rejects Eastman’s bid to scrap rulings that sent his emails to Jan. 6 investigators (opens Politico)

    Published

    Politico's feed description

    Justice Clarence Thomas bowed out as his colleagues rejected a petition from John Eastman.

  7. NBC10 Philadelphia

    Clarence Thomas recuses as Supreme Court rejects appeal by Trump lawyer John Eastman (opens NBC10 Philadelphia)

    Published

    NBC10 Philadelphia's feed description

    The Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal by former Donald Trump lawyer John Eastman, related to emails sent in the wake of the 2020 election.

  8. CNN

    SCOTUS declines to hear John Eastman’s appeal to undo ruling allowing House Jan. 6 committee access to his emails (opens CNN)

    Published

    CNN's feed description

    The Supreme Court said Monday that it will not take up former Donald Trump lawyer John Eastman’s request to undo a ruling that allowed the House January 6 select committee to access emails he said were shielded by attorney-client privilege.

  9. Washington Times

    Supreme Court rejects John Eastman’s challenge over email disclosure; Justice Thomas recuses himself (opens Washington Times)

    Published

    Washington Times's feed description

    The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not hear a challenge from pro-Trump attorney John Eastman, who argued against House Democrats’ obtaining his emails related to the investigation into the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.

Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.

Supreme Court declines to hear case from Trump attorney involving election interference | Since Then