Coverage dated February 8, 2026 to February 9, 2026

Massie Says 6 Names In Unredacted Epstein Files Could Be Incriminated

Headline from Forbes

Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., Ro Khanna, D-Calif. and Jamie Raskin, D-Md., were some of the first members of Congress to view the unredacted files.

Forbes's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.

Reports & sources

5 articles, oldest first.

Forbes
Massie Says 6 Names In Unredacted Epstein Files Could Be Incriminated (opens Forbes)
Published Feb 8, 2026
Forbes's feed description
Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., Ro Khanna, D-Calif. and Jamie Raskin, D-Md., were some of the first members of Congress to view the unredacted files.
The Week
Lawmakers say Epstein files implicate 6 more men (opens The Week)
Published Feb 9, 2026
The Week's feed description
The Trump department apparently blacked out the names of several people who should have been identified
Newsweek
Who Are Redacted Potential Co-Conspirators in Epstein Files? What We Know (opens Newsweek)
Published Feb 9, 2026
Newsweek's feed description
Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna are claiming the Department of Justice is improperly keeping the information private.
New York Post
Six men ‘likely incriminated’ by links to Jeffrey Epstein, lawmakers say after reviewing unredacted files (opens New York Post)
Published Feb 9, 2026
New York Post's feed description
Several redactions have been lifted from documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna accused the Justice Department of improperly blacking out names of possible co-conspirators.
The Guardian
Republican congressman says Epstein files ‘likely incriminated’ six more men (opens The Guardian)
Published Feb 9, 2026
The Guardian's feed description
Thomas Massie told reporters he may reveal the names under congressional privilege if the DoJ does not