Create account

Coverage dated August 19, 2024

Ohio lawsuit seeks rewrite of redistricting ballot language dubbed 'biased, inaccurate, deceptive'

Headline from WHEC Rochester

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The Ohio Supreme Court should step in on behalf of voters and order a rewrite of ballot language for a fall redistricting measure that “may be the most biased, inaccurate, deceptive, and unconstitutional" the state has ever seen, argues a lawsuit filed late Monday.

WHEC Rochester's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.

Read the reports

Reports & sources

7 articles, oldest first.

  1. WHEC Rochester

    Ohio lawsuit seeks rewrite of redistricting ballot language dubbed 'biased, inaccurate, deceptive' (opens WHEC Rochester)

    Published

    WHEC Rochester's feed description

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The Ohio Supreme Court should step in on behalf of voters and order a rewrite of ballot language for a fall redistricting measure that “may be the most biased, inaccurate, deceptive, and unconstitutional" the state has ever seen, argues a lawsuit filed late Monday.

  2. Cleveland Scene

    Anti-Gerrymandering Amendment Supporters Sue Ohio Ballot Board Over Ballot Language (opens Cleveland Scene)

    Published

    Cleveland Scene's feed description

    They call the wording, written by Frank LaRose, "the most biased, inaccurate, deceptive and unconstitutional ballot language ever adopted by the Ohio Ballot Board”

  3. Newsweek

    Ohio Board sued over ballot language: "deceptive and unconstitutional" (opens Newsweek)

    Published

    Newsweek's feed description

    The lawsuit was filed against various state officials over language on ballots for a redistricting measure.

Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.

Ohio lawsuit seeks rewrite of redistricting ballot language dubbed 'biased, inaccurate, deceptive' | Since Then