Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling leaves colleges looking for new ways to promote diversity
Headline from Omaha World-Herald
The Supreme Court has sent shockwaves through higher education with a landmark decision that struck down affirmative action and left colleges across the nation searching for new ways to promote student diversity.
Omaha World-Herald's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.
The Supreme Court’s ruling against affirmative action in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College will pose long-term legal ramifications, writes law professor Michael Gerhardt.
The decision, powered by the court's conservative justices with the liberal justices in dissent, was 6-3 against the University of North Carolina and 6-2 against Harvard.
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that race-conscious admission policies of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina violate the Constitution.
Harvard University responded to the Supreme Court's ruling against the university's admissions system, announcing in a statement it will “certainly" comply with the decision.
INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — Experts in constitutional law on Thursday said the Supreme Court’s ruling against affirmative action will change how colleges admit students. In a 6-3 ruling Thursday in the case of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v.
Chief Justice Roberts for the majority: "The race-based admissions systems that respondents employ also fail to comply with the twin commands of the Equal Protection Clause that race may never be used as a “negative” and that it may not operate as a stereotype."
A preliminary assessment of today's decisions. The majority rightly struck a blow against the use of racial preferences for purposes of advancing "diversity" in education. But there are some flaws in its reasoning.
WASHINGTON (DC News Now) — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action in college decisions on Thursday, June 29. The ruling limits the ability to use race as a factor for student…
The Supreme Court Harvard University and the University of North Carolina violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment in how they used race as factors in admissions decisions, upending more than 40 years of legal precedent.
After the Supreme Court rightly held that “Harvard’s and UNC’s admissions programs violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” President Joe Biden responded with a terrible defense of racial preferences in admissions.
Several college administrators indicated that the court's decision could create uncertainty and confusion regarding admissions procedures moving forward.
The Supreme Court nixed affirmative action programs for admission decisions at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina in a major ruling Thursday. Chief Justice John Roberts penned …
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina were unlawful. The decision is expected to curtail affirmative action at
Showing the first 25 of 112 headlines. ·
Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.
Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling leaves colleges looking for new ways to promote diversity | Since Then
