Coverage dated October 28, 2026 to October 30, 2026

Expert Judgement Can Be Easily Hacked by AI, Anthropic Study Finds

Headline from Gizmodo

In a recent study, 86% of participants followed Claude’s advice—but only a small fraction acknowledged the agent had played a role in their decision-making process.

Gizmodo's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.

Reports & sources

3 articles, oldest first.

  1. Al Jazeera

    Experts defer to AI in decision-making, Anthropic study finds (opens Al Jazeera)

    Published

    Al Jazeera's feed description

    Professional analysts chose options that matched AI assistant's preference 86 percent of the time, research finds.

  2. Gizmodo

    Expert Judgement Can Be Easily Hacked by AI, Anthropic Study Finds (opens Gizmodo)

    Published

    Gizmodo's feed description

    In a recent study, 86% of participants followed Claude’s advice—but only a small fraction acknowledged the agent had played a role in their decision-making process.

  3. Inc.

    Anthropic Gave AI Agents a Hidden Opinion. Experts Went Along With It 86% of the Time (opens Inc.)

    Published

    Inc.'s feed description

    A new study reveals that expert analysts blindly adopt AI recommendations over 80% of the time—without even realizing it. Here is what it means for your marketing team.

Expert Judgement Can Be Easily Hacked by AI, Anthropic Study Finds | Since Then