Coverage dated October 14, 2023

A Supreme Court dispute over a $15,000 IRS bill may be aimed at a never-enacted tax on billionaires

Headline from WUSA9

The case could upend parts of the U.S. tax code and rule out a much-discussed but never-enacted tax on wealth.

WUSA9's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.

Reports & sources

16 articles, oldest first.

  1. Triblive

    Supreme Court dispute over a $15,000 IRS bill may be aimed at a never-enacted tax on billionaires (opens Triblive)

    Published

    Triblive's feed description

    WASHINGTON — Charles and Kathleen Moore are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they contend is unconstitutional. The couple from Redmond, Washington, claim they had to pay the money because of their investment in an Indian company from which, as Charles Moore,

  2. WUSA9

    A Supreme Court dispute over a $15,000 IRS bill may be aimed at a never-enacted tax on billionaires (opens WUSA9)

    Published

    WUSA9's feed description

    The case could upend parts of the U.S. tax code and rule out a much-discussed but never-enacted tax on wealth.

  3. Seattle Times

    Redmond couple's $15,000 IRS bill ends up in Supreme Court; case could affect a possible wealth tax (opens Seattle Times)

    Published

    Seattle Times's feed description

    Charles and Kathleen Moore of Redmond, Wa., are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they believe is unconstitutional.

  4. WTOP Washington DC

    A couple with powerful help is asking the Supreme Court for a ruling that could affect a wealth tax (opens WTOP Washington DC)

    Published

    WTOP Washington DC's feed description

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Charles and Kathleen Moore are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they contend is unconstitutional. The couple from Redmond, Washington…

  5. Fortune

    Constitutionality of wealth tax at issue in dispute over $15,000 bill backed by business, conservative interests (opens Fortune)

    Published

    Fortune's feed description

    “There really was no reason for the court to take it on, other than to send a signal to warn off the Congress from passing a billionaire tax."

Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.

A Supreme Court dispute over a $15,000 IRS bill may be aimed at a never-enacted tax on billionaires | Since Then