Trump demands review of scientific manual used by federal judges
Headline from Courthouse News Service
The president said the government-backed compendium of scientific and technological information, used to help judges ruling on complex cases, has been “totally discredited” and accused its authors of misleading the courts on climate change.
Courthouse News Service's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.
Bravo, Mr. President! @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/nR9BQrDv3J — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) July 20, 2026 SAME PLAYBOOK, NEW REPORT: CLIMATE LITIGATION ACTIVISTS EMBEDDED IN NEW NAS ATTRIBUTION STUDY The National Academies are politically corrupted – ‘Has dived head-first into many progressive p…
President Donald Trump ordered a probe over the weekend as he said federal judges have been unduly influenced by a taxpayer-funded science organization pushing “discredited” climate activism. Trump lambasted the National Academy of Sciences on Sunday as he said guidebooks produced by the organizatio…
President Trump called for a “review” on Sunday of an updated judges’ manual that he claims the left improperly influenced. It follows the removal of a controversial climate science chapter from the new manual in response to conservative pressure.
The president said the government-backed compendium of scientific and technological information, used to help judges ruling on complex cases, has been “totally discredited” and accused its authors of misleading the courts on climate change.
President Donald Trump directed federal suspension and debarment officials on Sunday to review the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) following the release of a controversial climate change report. The NAS published a more than 250-page report on Thursday advocating for “attribution” research.
Trump just told the country on Truth Social that the National Academy of Sciences committed climate fraud. Federal officials are now deciding whether that fraud costs the Academy its funding. One review
Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.
Related updates
Separate coverage close to this update in time and subject.
