Coverage dated July 12, 2026 to July 18, 2026

Permanent daylight savings is bad for Americans’ health—here’s what science says could be better

Headline from Scientific American, on the newest of 2 developments

More sunlight in the evenings doesn’t always equate to better health

Scientific American's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.

Earlier updates in this story

Developments in this update

2 dated developments, oldest first, newest marked. Each is named by one outlet's own headline; open its reports to see every outlet that covered it.

  1. Trump wants to make daylight saving time permanent—but some fear the move would be a nightmare

    Headline from Phys ·

  2. Newest

    Permanent daylight savings is bad for Americans’ health—here’s what science says could be better

    Headline from Scientific American ·

5 reports not tied to one development ·

Read the reports

Reports & sources

29 articles, oldest first.

  1. Just the News

    U.S. House to vote on bill making daylight savings time permanent (opens Just the News)

    Published

    Just the News's feed description

    The Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 would end the nearly nationwide biannual clock changing and make daylight savings time permanent year-round.

  2. The Guardian

    US House committee advances bill to make daylight saving time permanent (opens The Guardian)

    Published

    The Guardian's feed description

    Bid to end clock-changing has bipartisan support, including the backing of Trump and some Democratic co-sponsors A bill to end the practice of changing clocks twice a year and make daylight saving time permanent passed a key committee in the US House of Representatives, setting it up for a potential…

  3. PhillyVoice

    President Trump wants to set clocks to daylight saving time year round. But standard time may be the better choice (opens PhillyVoice)

    Published

    PhillyVoice's feed description

    Legislation to make daylight savings time permanent year round has passed the House and is headed to the Senate. President Donald Trump backs it, but health experts warn that daylight saving time does not align well with the body's circadian rhythms and is linked to adverse public safety and health …

  4. Insider

    Lawmakers want to make daylight-saving time permanent — health experts say that's precisely the wrong idea (opens Insider)

    Published

    Insider's feed description

    The House just voted to enshrine daylight-saving time. Doctors say it's bad for our health.

  5. Phys

    Trump wants to make daylight saving time permanent—but some fear the move would be a nightmare (opens Phys)

    Published

    Phys's feed description

    One of the most intractable, contentious and niche issues in U.S. politics has come back into the spotlight. This week, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to make daylight saving time permanent in the United States.

  6. Crisis Magazine

    Please Abolish Daylight Savings: A Health First Choice (opens Crisis Magazine)

    Published

    Crisis Magazine's feed description

    The push to make Daylight Savings Time permanent is one of corporate profit over human health.

  7. New York Post

    Why permanent daylight saving time may be better for your health — as Congress revisits clock change (opens New York Post)

    Published

    New York Post's feed description

    This week, the House of Representatives passed the "Sunshine Protection Act," which would make Daylight Saving Time permanent.

  8. Scientific American

    Permanent daylight savings is bad for Americans’ health—here’s what science says could be better (opens Scientific American)

    Published

    Scientific American's feed description

    More sunlight in the evenings doesn’t always equate to better health

  9. The Hill

    Not everyone supports permanent daylight saving time. Here's why (opens The Hill)

    Published

    The Hill's feed description

    The U.S. could make daylight saving time permanent soon. Is that a good thing?

Identical headlines usually mean shared wire copy. They are counted as separate articles but are not independent confirmation.

Permanent daylight savings is bad for Americans’ health—here’s what science says could be better | Since Then