The Supreme Court's EPA Ruling Is a Big Setback for Fighting Climate Change, But Not a Death Knell
Headline from NBC New York
The Supreme Court limited the ability of the EPA in a landmark decision released Thursday. But the EPA and state governments still have many tools in their arsenal.
NBC New York's own description from its feed. We collect headlines and these descriptions, not full articles; read the original reporting below.
The Supreme Court curbed the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to broadly regulate carbon emissions from existing power plants, a major defeat for the Biden administration's attempts to slash emissions at a moment when scientists are sounding alarms about the accelerating pace of global warm…
The US Supreme Court has sharply limited the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) powers to regulate carbon emissions from power plants. The court's decision will severely impact the fight against climate change.
Supreme Court EPA decision takes power away from the bureaucracy and returns it to Congress and the people. This should prevent higher energy costs, as well.
The Supreme Court’s new climate change ruling is likely to hinder the Biden administration’s plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by the end of the decade and make the electric grid carbon-free by 2035.
The Supreme Court ruled the EPA could not instate a rule to monitor climate change causing sweeping ramifications for the future of the separation of powers.
In reporting on the Supreme Court’s decision on West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, which effectively eliminated the agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases, national TV news must provide crucial context, explaining that it's a victory for the fossil fuel industry, its political …
CNN By Ella Nilsen, CNN The Supreme Court on Thursday dealt a major blow to climate action by handcuffing the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate planet-warming emissions from the country’s power plants, just as scientists warn the world is running out of time to get the climate cr…
The Supreme Court ruled in the case of West Virginia v. EPA, a case that had potential major implications for the Biden administration's climate change agenda.
By deciding in favor of fossil fuel interests and limited regulatory authority, the Court has hampered EPA’s ability to mitigate power plant carbon pollution
A Supreme Court ruling limits Environmental Protection Agency leeway to regulate greenhouse gases, at a time when Congress hasn’t been acting on the issue.
The United States Supreme Court today sharply curtailed the Environmental Protection Agency’s power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants. The ruling could set back efforts to fight climate change, impact investments in renewables, and create regulatory uncertainty.
Jack McEvoy, DCNF Leading Biden officials outlined their methods to keep pushing the administration’s climate agenda if the Supreme Court limits the powers of the Environmental Protection […]
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Clean Air Act does not give the EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. The ruling limits the EPA to plant-by-plant regulation and could compromise the fight against climate change.
By CNN staff The Supreme Court on Thursday curbed the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to broadly regulate carbon emissions from existing power plants, a major defeat for the Biden administration’s attempts to slash emissions at a moment when scientists are sounding alarms about the acceler…
