Ongoing story / Los Angeles

The January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires and the Palisades Fire arson case

Overview · reviewed November 5, 2026

In January 2025, wildfires driven by Santa Ana winds swept through the Los Angeles area, destroying thousands of homes in Pacific Palisades and Altadena in what were expected to be the costliest fires in US history.[1][2][3] The Palisades Fire killed a dozen people, and the Eaton Fire killed 19; county fire officials later blamed Southern California Edison equipment for the Eaton Fire.[4][5] Federal prosecutors charged Jonathan Rinderknecht with starting the fire that became the Palisades Fire, but his first trial ended in a in June 2026, and his second trial began in November.[6][7][8]

Read the timeline

Follow this story to see new developments when you return.

The Palisades Fire killed a dozen people, and the Eaton Fire killed 19; county fire officials later blamed Southern California Edison equipment for the Eaton Fire.[4][5] Federal prosecutors charged Jonathan Rinderknecht with starting the fire that became the Palisades Fire, but his first trial ended in a in June 2026, and his second trial began in November.[6][7][8]

Coverage over time

Share of tracked outlets · weekly (UTC)

Week of 2025-01-06 (UTC): 50%, 110 of 221 tracked outlets (33 left, 55 center, 22 right)Week of 2025-01-13 (UTC): 32%, 73 of 228 tracked outlets (24 left, 32 center, 17 right)Week of 2025-01-20 (UTC): 28%, 63 of 226 tracked outlets (16 left, 34 center, 13 right)Week of 2025-01-27 (UTC): 19%, 42 of 223 tracked outlets (10 left, 24 center, 8 right)Week of 2025-02-03 (UTC): 13%, 25 of 190 tracked outlets (6 left, 15 center, 4 right)Week of 2025-02-10 (UTC): 3%, 6 of 214 tracked outlets (2 left, 3 center, 1 right)Week of 2025-02-17 (UTC): 21%, 40 of 194 tracked outlets (7 left, 22 center, 11 right)Week of 2025-02-24 (UTC): 5%, 9 of 197 tracked outlets (2 left, 4 center, 3 right)Week of 2025-03-03 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-03-10 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-03-17 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-03-24 (UTC): 3%, 5 of 194 tracked outlets (1 left, 4 center, 0 right)Week of 2025-03-31 (UTC): 3%, 7 of 205 tracked outlets (2 left, 5 center, 0 right)Week of 2025-04-07 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-04-14 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-04-21 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-04-28 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-05-05 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-05-12 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-05-19 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-05-26 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-06-02 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-06-09 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-06-16 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-06-23 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-06-30 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-07-07 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-07-14 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-07-21 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-07-28 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-08-04 (UTC): 6%, 11 of 194 tracked outlets (3 left, 8 center, 0 right)Week of 2025-08-11 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-08-18 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-08-25 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-09-01 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-09-08 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-09-15 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-09-22 (UTC): 6%, 11 of 189 tracked outlets (3 left, 7 center, 1 right)Week of 2025-09-29 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-10-06 (UTC): 17%, 31 of 181 tracked outlets (7 left, 15 center, 9 right)Week of 2025-10-13 (UTC): 4%, 7 of 182 tracked outlets (0 left, 5 center, 2 right)Week of 2025-10-20 (UTC): 5%, 9 of 194 tracked outlets (2 left, 6 center, 1 right)Week of 2025-10-27 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-11-03 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-11-10 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-11-17 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-11-24 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-12-01 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-12-08 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-12-15 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-12-22 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2025-12-29 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-01-05 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-01-12 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-01-19 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-01-26 (UTC): 7%, 14 of 189 tracked outlets (1 left, 6 center, 7 right)Week of 2026-02-02 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-02-09 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-02-16 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-02-23 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-03-02 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-03-09 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-03-16 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-03-23 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-03-30 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-04-06 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-04-13 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-04-20 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-04-27 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-05-04 (UTC): 3%, 6 of 175 tracked outlets (1 left, 5 center, 0 right)Week of 2026-05-11 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-05-18 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-05-25 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-06-01 (UTC): 1%, 2 of 186 tracked outlets (0 left, 2 center, 0 right)Week of 2026-06-08 (UTC): 8%, 15 of 200 tracked outlets (4 left, 6 center, 5 right)Week of 2026-06-15 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-06-22 (UTC): 5%, 19 of 415 tracked outlets (4 left, 7 center, 8 right)Week of 2026-06-29 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-07-06 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-07-13 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-07-20 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-07-27 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-08-03 (UTC): 5%, 29 of 537 tracked outlets (9 left, 14 center, 6 right)Week of 2026-08-10 (UTC): 3%, 14 of 545 tracked outlets (3 left, 9 center, 2 right)Week of 2026-08-17 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-08-24 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-08-31 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-09-07 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-09-14 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-09-21 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-09-28 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-10-05 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-10-12 (UTC): 1%, 7 of 476 tracked outlets (3 left, 2 center, 2 right)Week of 2026-10-19 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-10-26 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outletsWeek of 2026-11-02 (UTC): 1%, 6 of 471 tracked outlets (3 left, 3 center, 0 right)Week of 2026-11-09 (UTC): no coverage from tracked outlets, so far

LeftCenterRightLighter bar: this week so far

Each bar is the share of the outlets on our Left / Center / Right rating scale that we tracked publishing that week which carried reporting on this story, split by the outlets' ratings. We track more outlets now than in the archive, so a share keeps earlier and later weeks comparable. An outlet counts once a week however much it published, and outlets in one ownership or syndication group count as one on each side they appear on. A rating describes the outlet, not the report. A gap means no such reports were collected that week, not that nothing was reported anywhere. Weeks run Monday to Sunday in UTC, so a report published on a Sunday evening in US Eastern time counts in the next week. 13 more outlets off the scale (not rated, or outside the left-right graphs) also reported; they are not in this chart. See them.

Weekly counts, outlets and reports (24 weeks with coverage)
Outlets on the rating scale that carried this story each week, of the outlets tracked that week, newest first
Week of (UTC)LeftCenterRightOf trackedShareReceipts
Nov 2, 20263306 of 4711%
Oct 12, 20263227 of 4761%
Aug 10, 202639214 of 5453%
Aug 3, 2026914629 of 5375%
Jun 22, 202647819 of 4155%
Jun 8, 202646515 of 2008%
Jun 1, 20260202 of 1861%
May 4, 20261506 of 1753%
Jan 26, 202616714 of 1897%
Oct 20, 20252619 of 1945%
Oct 13, 20250527 of 1824%
Oct 6, 2025715931 of 18117%
Sep 22, 202537111 of 1896%
Aug 4, 202538011 of 1946%
Mar 31, 20252507 of 2053%
Mar 24, 20251405 of 1943%
Feb 24, 20252439 of 1975%
Feb 17, 20257221140 of 19421%
Feb 10, 20252316 of 2143%
Feb 3, 2025615425 of 19013%
Jan 27, 20251024842 of 22319%
Jan 20, 202516341363 of 22628%
Jan 13, 202524321773 of 22832%
Jan 6, 2025335522110 of 22150%

Latest coverage

The newest reporting in this story's record.

  1. Nov 2, 2026 · first reported · Headline from Courthouse News Service

    Palisades Fire arson suspect goes on trial for second time

Background

On January 7, 2025, a brush fire driven by unrelenting winds burned more than 15,000 acres in the Pacific Palisades and forced thousands from their homes.[9] The Santa Ana winds, dry and gusty winds that blow toward the coast in cooler months, can turn a spark into a raging wildfire.[10] Within a day thousands of firefighters were battling at least three separate fires,[1] winds not seen in more than a decade fanned blazes across Los Angeles and Ventura counties, and tens of thousands of people evacuated.[11] By January 12 at least 11 people had died and more than 12,000 structures had burned.[3] The Eaton and Palisades fires burned more of the state's dense urban area than any California fire since at least the mid-1980s, an AP analysis found,[12] and crews reached full containment on January 31.[13]

Read the full background (3 more paragraphs)

The response came under scrutiny. Weeks before the fires, Fire Chief Kristin Crowley had warned that Mayor Karen Bass's budget cuts limited the department's response to large emergencies,[14] and in February Bass fired her, citing failures in leadership before the windstorm.[15] The AP found that the first evacuation order for the neighborhoods nearest the Palisades fire came about 40 minutes after some homes were already burning,[16] and an outside review later found that a lack of resources and outdated alert policies delayed warnings in Altadena and the Palisades.[17] A scientific study found that human-caused climate change had made the hot, dry and windy conditions more likely and more intense.[18]

Recovery brought political and financial fights. President Donald Trump threatened to withhold disaster aid unless California changed its approach to water management,[19] then toured the damage.[20] Gov. Gavin Newsom asked Congress for nearly $40 billion in aid,[21] and State Farm, the state's largest home insurer, sought an emergency rate increase averaging 22%.[22] In 2026 the state's insurance regulator found that State Farm had violated state law in handling fire claims,[23] and Trump signed an order meant to speed reconstruction.[24] Lawsuits accused Southern California Edison of starting the Eaton Fire,[25] and in August 2026 county fire officials concluded that its equipment caused the fire, which destroyed or damaged more than 9,000 homes and businesses.[5]

In October 2025, investigators arrested Jonathan Rinderknecht, a 29-year-old Florida man, on suspicion of arson.[26][27] Prosecutors said he started the Lachman Fire just after midnight on January 1, a fire they said smoldered for a week and grew into the Palisades Fire.[6][28] He pleaded not guilty to three federal charges.[28] At his trial in June 2026, prosecutors said he wanted "revenge" against society, but the jury deadlocked and the judge declared a mistrial.[7][29] In August prosecutors filed a revised that dropped one of the three counts.[30] His second trial began on November 2.[8]

Supporting stories (30)
  1. New fire, more evacuations near Los Angeles after at least 10,000 structures burned
  2. LA wildfire death toll rises to 30 after human remains discovered in Altadena ruins
  3. The LA county wildfires could be the costliest in US history, early estimates say
  4. Los Angeles trial to begin for man accused of sparking the deadly Palisades Fire
  5. Utility’s idle transmission tower caused 2025 Eaton Fire that killed 19, Los Angeles officials say
  6. Jonathan Rinderknecht facing new federal charges in Palisades Fire
  7. Mistrial declared after jury deadlocks in Palisades Fire trial
  8. Palisades arson case: Second trial begins against man accused of sparking wildfire
  9. California governor says Pacific Palisades wildfire has destroyed many structures as winds kick up
  10. How Santa Ana Winds Push Deadly California Wildfires to New Heights
  11. Los Angeles wildfire death toll rises to 24 as firefighters brace for more fierce winds
  12. Los Angeles fires have scorched largest urban area in California in at least 40 years
  13. California’s Palisades and Eaton fires both 100 percent contained —three weeks after erupting
  14. Los Angeles cut $17.5M from fire department budget months before deadly fires
  15. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass ousts fire chief over deadly wildfires
  16. Homes were burning and roads already jammed when Pacific Palisades evacuation order came, AP finds
  17. LA County response to deadly fires slowed by lack of resources, outdated alert process, report says
  18. Study says climate change made conditions that fed California wildfires more likely, more intense
  19. Trump heads to California to view wildfire devastation in first presidential trip of second term
  20. President Trump Tours Los Angeles Wildfire Damage, Pledges '100%' of Federal Support
  21. California governor asks Congress for nearly $40 billion for Los Angeles wildfire relief
  22. State Farm Seeks Emergency California Rate Hike After LA Fires
  23. California says State Farm violated the law in handling of insurance claims after 2025 LA wildfires
  24. Trump signs executive order to fast-track rebuilding of homes destroyed by LA wildfires
  25. Southern California Edison accused in lawsuits of failing to prevent Eaton Fire
  26. Palisades Fire arrest: Man arrested in Florida, charged with starting deadly LA wildfire
  27. Jonathan Rinderknecht: Man accused of starting deadly Palisades Fire in federal court Thursday
  28. Man pleads not guilty to sparking deadly Palisades Fire in Los Angeles
  29. Palisades Fire verdict: Jury deadlocked; Florida man charged with starting historic California fire
  30. Arson suspect in Palisades Fire faces 1 less criminal charge in revised indictment ahead of retrial

The full record

Each date is when an update was first reported.

All 79 recorded updates

November 2026

  1. Palisades arson case: Second trial begins against man accused of sparking wildfireHeadline from Los Angeles Times · 7 outlets

October 2026

  1. California orders lenders to report on their handling of insurance payouts to LA fire survivorsHeadline from Philadelphia Inquirer · 7 outlets

August 2025

  1. New studies tie unrecognized deaths and health problems to Maui and LA wildfiresHeadline from The Columbian · 11 outlets

March 2025

  1. Cal Fire releases new fire hazard maps for Southern CaliforniaHeadline from Foxla · 6 outlets

Coverage & sources

Read the reports, see how much was collected over time, or compare outlets by political leaning.

Coverage & sources →